CREATING AMD TESTING INCLUSIONAL AND POSTCOLONIAL LIVING
EDUCATIONAL THEORIES
 
 
 
Overview
 
The seminar is an exercise in social validity. Its aim is to
test the validity of shared understandings of inclusional meanings of new
living standards of critical judgement in the educational theories of
practitioner-researchers. Each contributor will present their research into
their own educational influence. That is, their educational influence in their
own learning, the learning of others and in the education of the social
formations in which they are living and working. They are researching from
within an inclusional perspective and will make transparent the assumptions in
this perspective. Inclusionality is a newly emerging awareness of the
evolutionary relationship between physical space and boundaries. Each
contributor will address the ontological, epistemological and methodological
significances of inclusionality for their educational enquiries. They will do
this in terms of the development of their contexualised explanations of
educational influences in their living theories of learning and self-identity
in their professional practices.
 
The new living standards of critical judgement for testing
the validity of educational theories will include: the postcolonial critical
pedagogy of a mixed-race diversity officer in a British Higher Education
Institution; a pedagogy of the unique and web of betweenness of an Irish
University Educator; the passion for compassion of a practitioner-researcher in
an Institute for Mental Health; the pedagogisation of a living theory
curriculum for the healing nurse in a Japanese University; the educational
influence in their own learning of undergraduate students and lecturer in a
life, environment and people curriculum in a British University; a flow of
life-affirming energy in educational relationships in ChinaÕs Experimental
Centre for Educational Action Research in Foreign Languages Teaching.
 
The seminar builds on previous symposia at AERA and BERA on:
 
AERA 04: 
The transformative potential
of individualsÕ collaborative self-studies for sustainable global educational
networks of communication.
 
BERA 04: 
a) Have we created a new
epistemology for the new scholarship of educational enquiry through  practitioner research: Developing
sustainable global educational networks of communication.
 
b) How are we contributing to a new scholarship of
educational enquiry through our pedagogisation of postcolonial living
educational theories in the Academy?
 and the
research programmes in 17 living educational theory doctorates at http://www.actionresearch.net/living.shtml
.  The seminar marks a
transformatory advance in understanding the nature of the living critical
standards of judgement that can be used to test the validity of claims to
educational knowledge made from within a living theory perspective. 
 
The ontological significance of the seminar is that the
practitioner-researchers will be showing how their accounts of their enquiry-learning
include the embodied values they use to give their lives meaning and purpose.
These ontological values are transformed into epistemological standards of
judgement in the course of their emergence and clarification in practice. While
each narrative of learning demonstrates a unique form of methodological
inventiveness, the methodologies are recognisable as forms of action research. 
| Title:   | Pedagogising a living educational theory curriculum for
  healing nurses   | 
| Authors & affiliations: | Je Kan Adler-Collins, Fukuoka University, Japan. | 
| Abstract: | The cultural context of my question is the Faculty of
  Nursing at Fukuoka Prefectural University in Japan. The history, economics
  and politics of this social context are important to my enquiry as I am
  seeking to influence the education and the social formation of a new faculty
  of nursing through the design and pedagogisation (of a curriculum for healing
  and enquiry nurses. This is a context for my own learning between September
  2004 & September 2005 as I ask, research and answer the question, 'How am
  I developing a curriculum and pedagogy for healing and enquiring nurses in
  living my life of learning in educational enquiry?'   The research context is focused on my knowledge-creation
  as I seek to contribute to the development of a new epistemology for a new
  scholarship of educational enquiry for healing nurses. The development of
  this epistemology will be studied as part of the process through which the
  embodied knowledge of nursing practitioners is validated and legitimated in
  the Academy. This will involve the clarification of the embodied values in
  the process of their emergence in nursing practice. It will also involve the
  clarification of my own embodied values and knowledge as I design and
  pedagogise a curriculum for the healing and enquiring nurse. In the process
  of this clarification, the embodied values and knowledge will become
  transformed into living educational standards of judgment and practice that
  can be used to evaluate the validity of my knowledge claims.   | 
 
Generic template 1.1
16/7/2003
 
| Title:   | A pedagogy of the unique and web of betweenness | 
| Authors & affiliations: | Margaret Farren, Dublin City University | 
| Abstract: | This presentation analyses the growth of my educational
  knowledge as higher education educator, over six years of my self-study, as I
  develop my pedagogy of the unique and co-create a curriculum in collaboration
  with teachers on an award bearing programme in ICT in education.   I will show how I have clarified the meaning of my values
  in the course of their emergence in my practice of enquiry. The ontological
  values, which I have clarified have become stabilised and have become
  epistemological standards of judgement. 
  One of my stable standards of judgement, the Web of Betweenness
  respects the unique constellation of values that I, and practitioners can
  contribute to a knowledge base of practice. The Web of Betweenness is a
  relational, connected, dialogic and mutually collaborative learning
  environment.  It has been
  generated and sustained through a spirit of community, which values each
  human being.  ICT can bring
  embodied values into the public domain using forms of representation that
  move beyond text.   This is a professional journey that involved risk, courage
  and challenge and I present my explanation of my educational influence in my
  own learning as I create my pedagogy of the unique. This includes an analysis
  of how I learn and extend my educational knowledge in mutual dialogue and collaboration
  with others.      | 
 
Generic template 1.1
16/7/2003
 
| Title:   | Developing a postcolonial critical pedagogy and a
  postcolonial living educational theory   | 
| Authors & affiliations: | Paulus Murray, Royal Agricultural College. | 
| Abstract: | I am a professional educator and practitioner-researcher
  who is exploring the development of his postcolonial critical pedagogy in the
  creation of a postcolonial living educational theory. I have chosen to give
  expression to this research into my educational life as a practice and
  narrative of self-reflective inquiry.    This presentation is focused on my learning between
  September 2004 to September 2005 as I lead a postgraduate Action Masters
  course and exercise and develop my living educational standards of judgement.
  These living standards are grounded in my embodied knowledge of the loving
  spirit of Ubuntu.   Being an educator and researcher who self-designates as
  ÔMixed RaceÕ means that I am one of those very rare teachers in British
  higher education whose ontological development and epistemological interests
  have emerged from a dialectical experience within a Whiteness-centred society
  (Ifekwunigwe, 1998).    In this presentation I will explain how I problematise
  ÔWhitenessÕ in my educational practice and clarify the embodied values that
  flow through my experience of performing my ÔMixed-RaceÕ identity with the
  spirit of Ubuntu. I will be seeking to show that this clarification of my
  embodied values transforms them into living and communicable standards of
  judgement that can be used in the pedagogisation of inclusive, postcolonial
  living educational theories in the Academy.     Ifekwunigwe, J. (1998) Scattered
  Belongings: Cultural Paradoxes of "Race," Nation and Gender.
  London: Routledge    | 
 
Generic template 1.1
16/7/2003
 
| Title:   | The emergence of a living
  theory of responsive practice. | 
| Authors & affiliations: | Marian Naidoo National Institute of Mental Health, England | 
| Abstract: | I am a story teller and the
  focus of this narrative is on my learning and the development of my living
  educational theory between September 2004 and September 2005 as I have
  engaged with others in a creative and critical practice    This narrative demonstrates how
  I have encouraged people to work creatively, critically and imaginatively in
  order to improve the way they relate and communicate in a multi-professional
  healthcare setting in order to improve both the quality of care provided and
  the well being of the system.   In telling the story of the
  unique development of my responsive practice I will show how I have been
  influenced by the work of theatre practitioners such as Augusto Boal,
  educational theorists such as Paulo Freire and drawn on, incorporated and
  developed ideas from complexity theory.  This original account of my
  emerging practice challenges the dominant management theories of life in
  organisations which focus on command and control and the reduction of uncertainty
  rather than as is explored in this thesis, developing the capacity to live
  creatively within uncertainty by exploring identity, strengthening
  relationships and improving communication.     | 
 
Generic template 1.1
16/7/2003
 
| Title:   | Inclusionality, Llfe, Environment and People | 
| Authors & affiliations: | Alan Rayner, University of Bath | 
| Abstract: | This contribution analyses how I
  have lived the following with my undergraduate students.     ÒMy intention in the course is
  to provide an opportunity for us to reflect and learn together about how to
  apply our scientific and biological knowledge effectively and creatively in a
  social and environmental context. This joint reflection and learning will
  include an enquiry into methods of scientific enquiry, perception and
  communication in order to identify possible limitations in current thinking
  and prospects for the development of approaches that can enhance and deepen
  our understanding of our human relationships with the living world.    An important aim will be to
  enhance our awareness of the uncertainties implicit in the dynamic processes
  that underlie the functioning and ecological and evolutionary responsiveness
  of living systems, with a view to developing patterns of working with these
  systems that can enhance quality of life. I will draw attention to the need
  to seek complementary relationship rather than opposition, and contrast this
  with purely objective approaches aimed at imposing control. I will suggest
  that working with living systems
  requires sensitivity to the receptivity and responsiveness of indeterminate
  (dynamically bounded) forms that is often absent when working upon Human-made constructions. The co-evolution of life forms
  in tune with their environmental context cannot be equated with the
  prescriptive precision of the assembly line. Life is not constructed from a
  set of pre-existing Ôbuilding blocksÕ: it is much richer, deeper and more
  intimately involved with its ever-changing living space than that metaphor
  implies.Ó   | 
 
Generic template 1.1
16/7/2003
 
| Title:   | Living critical standards of judgement in educational
  theorising | 
| Authors & affiliations: | Jack 
  Whitehead, University of Bath | 
| Abstract: | This presentation analyses the educational influence
  of  practitioner-researchers in
  their own learning, in the learning of others and in the education of the
  social formations in which we live, work and research. The evidential bases
  of the analysis are 17 doctoral theses awarded between1996 and 2005 for which
  I was sole or joint supervisor, including my own. These can be accessed at http://www.bath.ac.uk/~edsajw/living.shtml   The analysis will show how each practitioner-researcher
  clarifies, in the course of their emergence, in the practice of educational
  enquiry, the embodied ontological values to which they hold themselves
  accountable in their professional practice.  The analysis will also show how, through the process of
  clarification, the embodied values are transformed into the living
  epistemological standards of critical judgement used to test the validity of
  the claims to educational knowledge in each doctoral thesis. These standards
  of judgement will include the traditional standards of originality of mind,
  critical judgement, original contribution to knowledge and extent and merit
  of the work.   The scholarly significance of the analysis is that it
  shows an inclusional form of educational theorising that overcomes
  limitations in the generation of explanations for the educational influence
  of individuals in learning, from propositional and dialectical theories of
  education.   A distinction will be drawn between education theories and
  educational theories. This distinction will be used to show how living
  educational theories can draw insights from the traditional theories of
  education while being resistant to categorisation within any existing
  discipline of education. The need to develop a new discipline of educational
  enquiry, to explain the educational influence of individuals in their own
  learning, in the learning of others and in the education of social
  formations, will be explained.           | 
 
Generic template 1.1
16/7/2003