PhD Candidature
Statement
This
thesis will explore the question Ôhow do I improve my practiceÕ in the context of
helping managersÕ on the two year E Learning Coached MA in Leadership Studies
at Exeter University, improve their contribution to leadership in their
organisations, In the process, we will jointly explore the nature, means, and
value of embodying leadership as a ÔprocessÕ phenomenon (process-as-ontology),
as well as the view that leadership and its development is best approached Ôas
an artÕ (Grint, 2000 ).
The
research will represent a sustained inquiry into the dialectic of how I and
others shape and are shaped by my/our practices, and to understand what
Ôembodied practiceÕ means and how to achieve it. Through constructing a
narrative of my own learning as the students/practitioner researchers construct
their own Ôreflective biographiesÕ, I/we will attempt to realise a more
relational, systemic and timely expression of my/our embodied knowing. To do
this, I/we will seek to create an extended Ôrelational epistemologyÕ to make
sense of our lived experience in both the Ôteaching /researcherÕ and the
Ôfield/practitionerÕ domains.
The
research will engage critically with ideas coming from a number of different
fields: the systemic and social construction traditions, FoucaultÕs work on
self and power relations, insights emerging from complexity theory, and findings
from cognitive science on the pervasive influence of metaphor and tacit,
embodied knowledge. These ideas will be used intuitively in response to the
perceived needs of students during extended cycles of action and reflection, to
help us access and critique tacit and ÔmarginalisedÕ knowledges relevant to the
issues we are inquiring into, and contribute to a Ômulti-modalÕ framework of
knowing. Subsidiary areas of interest will include the role of humour and
improvisation in helping both the managers and myself work creatively with the
dilemmas involved in this study of education for improving leadership in
diverse work situations.
This
work will cast light on the possibility of accelerating the development of
managers to lead in more relational, and emergent ways. In jointly
understanding, improving, evaluating, and explaining the learning and developmental
process that influences our knowing, doing, and being, I/we will search for
insights into our Ôpedagogic practiceÕ. In this we will look at the
relations between
both the macro ÔconditionsÕ which can create contexts for learning and working,
and the relational Ômicro-practicesÕ which help translate these into embodied
practice. The living standards of judgment that emerge and that we consequently
use to account for the claims we make, will indicate the efficacy of this
pegagogy for the education of practitioner researchers in higher education
during an age of ÔsupercomplexityÕ (Barnett, 2001).
Keith
Kinsella August,
2005.