Transforming Our
Bodies, Nations & Knowledges Through Action Researching The Educational
Influences Of Our Cosmopolitan Pedagogies
Jack Whitehead,
Department of Education, University of Bath
Notes for a presentation
to the Australian Critical Race and Whiteness Studies Association
(ACRAWSA) on the 11th
December 2007 at the University of South Australia, City West Campus, Adelaide.
Originally due to be presented as a joint paper with Yaakub Murray.
Yaakub
Murray apologises for his absence. In the light of Yaakub's absence I have
modified my presentation to focus on some possible contributions of my
educational research programme for critical race and whiteness studies in an
Australian context. I am thinking particularly of the contributions of
generating living educational theories with a cosmopolitan pedagogy.
My understandings of a
cosmopolitan pedagogy have developed through my experience and reflections of
being present in the following communicative relationships with Yaakub.
In the following clip Yaakub is
presenting our joint paper on
'White and Black with White Identities in self-studies of
teacher-educator practices.' At the 2000 AERA Conference in New Orleans (Murray
& Whitehead, 2000). As this was Yaakub's first presentation at an
international conference it seemed appropriate for him to take the allocated 20
minutes to present our paper. In the clip he is focusing on the significance of
values in our enquiries and as I watch the clip I recall the life-affirming
energy in his expression and his willingness to account for himself in relation
to values of humanity that for me distinguish a cosmopolitan pedagogy.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GwwtDdsAfp8
In the next clip there is a sudden
explosion of laughter as we connect our discussion on racialising discourses
between a white and a mixed-race educator to the co-incidence that Yaakub's
black father was called Jack as is his white supervisor (me!). I associate the
spontaneity of the laughter and flow of life-affirming energy with a healthy
expression of well-being that helps to sustain a creative space for dialogue is
a cosmopolitan pedagogy.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q3TjLxEiyPk
In the following clip, the
student's video helps to emphasise our relational dynamic in space and
boundaries. We are engaged in an educational enquiry into the meaning of a text
on progressive Islam. Our boundaries are open to each others' enquiries. There
is a flow of communication between us and again and in the laughter between us
at the end of the clip I experience the pleasure of our engagement. In watching
this clip I feel a mutually in the relationship that I distinguish in terms of
our common humanity and in which I believe that we are sharing our expressions
of our cosmopolitan pedagogies.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ud-zPjvae8
In the next clip I am video-taping
Yaakub addressing a conference on addiction in Bath in 2006. He is talking
about the expression of legitimate anger and the importance of racialising
discourses in the face of addictions to forms of thought that reproduce
institutional racialism. I identify Yaakub's form of communication in terms of
a cosmopolitan pedagogy as he is expressing the values of common humanity and
clear understandings of legitimate anger in a way that is intended to influence
the education of social formations away from institutional racism and into
celebrating diversity and inclusionality. In this clip I identify Yaakub's
unique expression of his cosmopolitan pedagogy with both Bernstein's (2000)
idea of pedagogy and Said's (1994) idea of cosmopolitan.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FpLpca0BDSA
What
I mean by a living educational theory is an explanation of an individual's
educational influence in their own learning, in the learning of others and in
the learning of the social formations in which they live and work. What I mean
by a cosmopolitan pedagogy is a pedagogy that engages with critical race and
whiteness studies in the generation and communication of educational knowledge
that carries hope for the future of humanity. Part of this hope has already
been expressed by the organizing group for the conference in their
acknowledgement that we are meeting on the traditional country of the Kaurna
people of the Adelaide Plains:
"We
recognize and respect their cultural heritage, beliefs and relationshipo with
the land. We acknowledge that they are or continuing importance to the Kaurna
people living today" (ACRAWSA, 2007).
Sharon
Gollan, Kathleen Stacey, Claire Ralfs, Lillian Holt (2007) and Odette Kelada
(2007) have emphasized the importance of interrogating one's own whiteness as a
white person. By whiteness I am meaning power relations that serve the
interests of sustaining and enhancing the privileges and supremacy of white
people.
The
privileges I have received from being white and living in the UK are too
numerous to list here. Perhaps the most significant for my economic well being
and productive life is the privilege of a tenured contract of employment at the
University of Bath from 1977. This privilege in turn was based on the privilege
of access to free schooling and health service and free higher education for a
first degree in science, a masters degree in the psychology of education and a
doctorate in educational theory.
So, for all my life I have benefited from the privileges of whiteness.
One response I could have to this privilege is to analyse it in terms of Gloria
Ladson-Billing's (2006) critical race theory as part of an 'Education Debt'.
"The
achievement gap is one of the most talked-about issues in U.S. education. The
term refers to the disparities in standardized test scores between Black and
White, Latina/o and White, and recent immigrant and White students. This
article argues that a focus on the gap is misplaced. Instead, we need to look
at the 'education debt' that has accumulated over time. This debt comprises
historical, economic, sociopolitical and moral components. The author draws an
analogy with the concept of national debt – which she contrasts with that
of a national budget deficit – to argue the significance of the education
debt."
(Ladson-Billings, 2006, p. 3)
I
understand Ladson-Billing's analysis and can feel the motivating power of the
idea of an 'education debt' for improving the educational opportunities and
accomplishments of all students in overcoming disparities. However my own
motivations are different. The emerged in response to my recognition at the age
of 6 of what human beings were capable of doing to each other on grounds of
difference. Being 63 I was born in the UK in the last year of the second world
war, a war fueled by an explicit racist ideology of Aryan supremacy. Since this
recognition the expression of my own life-affirming energy has fueled responses
to a life of educational enquiry that I intend to be a contribution to
enhancing hope for the future of humanity.
So,
what I have I done in response to the recognition of my own white privilege and
to crimes against humanity?
My
initial response may initially sound unconnected with my question when I say
that I have spent my working life in the Academy contributing to the
reconstruction of educational theory. However, I see a close connection between
the educational theories I use to give meaning and purpose to my life and my
answer to the above question. I see the connection in relation to my expression
of an educational responsibility to account for my own life in relation to
answers to the above question in the generation of my own living educational
theory. Through my tutoring and
supervision of masters and doctoral programmes at the University of Bath I have
been able to offer support to others who also wish to generate their own living
educational theories. In this way I have sought to fulfill part of the mission
of the University of Bath which is to have a distinct academic approach to the
education of professional practitioners.
Let
me show you what I have been doing with the living educational theories flowing
through web-space. As I do this I am asking you to consider the possibility
that a new epistemology has been created that can help to legitimate indigenous
knowledges in the Academy. I am thinking of an epistemology in which living
logics and new standards of judgment are clarified from the ground of our
embodied knowledges; the embodied knowledges we are using in contributing to
the transformation of our bodies and nations as we ask, research and answer
questions of the kind, 'how do I improve what I am doing?'
I
am also asking you to consider the possibility that a living theory approach to
action research could support members of ACRAWSA in contributing to the
transformation of knowledges in the Academy as well as our bodies and nations.
I am thinking of an approach in which we share our stories of our educational
influences in learning as we integrate our critical race and whiteness studies
into our cosmopolitan pedagogies.
Here
are some of the ways in which I think we could share our stories as living
educational theories flowing through web-space.
Having
access to the web-resources at http://www.actionresearch.net
means that I can draw your attention to multi-media representations in doctoral
theses and masters dissertations that have already legitimated new living
standards of judgment in the Academy. For example, Charles' (2007) has
legitimated his understandings of ubuntu ways of being, enquiring and knowing,
guiltless recognition and societal reidentification in researching the
transformation of bodies and knowledges.
The legitimation of Charle's
expression of his embodied knowledge in the Academy carries hope for the
transformation of knowledges, from those that sever the knower from the known
and sustain the damaging power relations of institutionalised racism, to those
that celebrate diversity and carry hope for the future of humanity. In the
following clip Charles is explaining his learning about values that carry hope
for humanity from working with women in Sierra Leone as he understood their
loving responses to their children; children who had been born as a result of
being raped by the soldiers who killed their husbands in the civil war.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EcfZE_z-C_w
Charles'
thesis integrates visual narratives for communicating the meanings of the
expression of his embodied values and understandings. Access to the visual data
on streamed servers is helping to transform our perceptions of our bodies with
space and our understandings of how to bring embodied knowedge into the Academy
as legitimate academic knowledge.
While the influence of global communications through the internet needs
further exploration in terms of explaining its transformatory power for
nations, we may be able to feel and see transformations in our own perceptions
as the visual media show us the nature of our interrelationships.
Following
Murray (2007) I claim that a living educational theory approach to personal and
social transformation provides a way of transforming our bodies and knowledges
that might also bring transformatory possibility to nations, while holding as
problematic the future of 'nation states' as a viable organizational form for
political and social aspiration.
In
contributing to these transformations I believe that the majority of us will
experience some painful rejections and oppositions that carry the potential for
scarification. By scarification I mean the experience of emotional abuse or
lack of recognition that carries a pressure to close down creative dialogue. In
response to this pressure I am suggesting that we work at sustaining our
educational conversations. Through working in a creative space, paradoxically
sustained with privileges of whiteness, I have been fortunate to be able to
continue to sustain such conversations. These include evidence-based analyses
that share generative responses for resisting such scarifications in the
practice of cosmopolitan pedagogies and pedagogies of the unique (Farren, 2007)
and in the generation of living educational theories (McNiff, 2007).
Margaret
Farren is one of the world's most impressive exponents of e-learning. You can
see some of Margaret's work at Dublin City University at http://webpages.dcu.ie/~farrenm/
including her doctorate How
Can I Create A Pedagogy Of The Unique Through A Web Of Betweenness? :
"The 'web of betweenness'
refers to how we learn in relation to one another and also how ICT can enable
us to get closer to communicating the meanings of our embodied values. I see it
as a way of expressing my understanding of education as 'power with', rather
than 'power over', others. It is this 'power with' that I have tried to embrace
as I attempt to create a learning environment in which I, and
practitioner-researchers, can grow personally and professionally. A 'pedagogy
of the unique' respects the unique constellation of values and standards of
judgement that each practitioner-researcher contributes to a knowledge base of
practice." (Farren, 2005, Abstract).
I
draw insights and inspiration from her understandings of a pedagogy of the
unique and the celtic spirituality that informs her web of betweenness.
Jean
McNiff is a Professor of
Educational Research who is supporting the generation of living theories
through action research in South Africa, Iceland, China, the UK and elsewhere
in the world. You can access some of this work at:
http://www.jeanmcniff.com/reports.html
The
past two years have seen the culmination of over ten years of sustained enquiry
by practitioner-researchers supervised by Jean, first for their masters degrees
and then for their doctorates, at the University of Limerick. Supervisors of
doctoral programmes will know how much passion and sustained commitment moves a
doctoral research programme to a successful completion and what an
accomplishment it is to see 5 doctorates graduating within a two year period.
Bernie
Sullivan (2006) A Living Theory of a
Practice of Social Justice: Realising the Right of Traveller Children to
Educational Equality. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Limerick.
M‡ir’n
Glenn (2006) Working with collaborative projects: my
living theory of a holistic educational practice Ph.D. Thesis, University of
Limerick.
Caitriona
McDonagh (2007) My living theory of learning to teach for social
justice: How do I enable primary school children with specific
learning disability (dyslexia) and myself as their teacher to realise our learning
potentials? Ph.D. Thesis, University of Limerick.
Mary
Roche (2007) Towards a living theory
of caring pedagogy: interrogating my practice to nurture a critical,
emancipatory and just community of enquiry. Ph.D. Thesis, University of
Limerick.
Margaret Cahill (2007) My Living
Educational Theory of Inclusional Practice. Ph.D. Thesis, University of
Limerick. (Available from http://www.jeanmcniff.com/reports.html
in January 2008).
Here is the Abstract from
Margaret's thesis:
This thesis is the articulation
of my living educational theory of inclusional practice, which evolved through
undertaking research in the area of educational provision for
marginalised children. It is a narrative account in which I offer
descriptions of and explanations for my practice, as I transform my educational
contexts into a celebration of democratically-constituted inclusional
practices.
The thesis demonstrates how my
embodied values of justice, inclusion and equality compelled me to develop
social and educational practices that included potentially marginalised
children. My living educational theory of inclusional practice therefore
contains within itself a living theory of social justice premised on the idea
that all are equal participants in democratic public discourses. I explain how
I have transformed these values into the living critical standards of judgement
by which I wish my work to be evaluated.
My original contributions to
knowledge are to do with how I demonstrate the development of inclusional
practices that are grounded in the realisation of my values that honour the
individual and enable them to become agents in the creation of an inclusive society.
From the grounds of my evidence base, I claim to have developed an inclusional
practice that has profound implications of the education of the teaching
profession and other social formations. (Roche,
2007)
I
am hopeful that these five living theory doctorates together with the resources
at http://www.actionresearch.net
will captivate your imaginations as to the possibilities of living educational
theories contributing to the transformation of our bodies, knowledges and
nations through the expression of our cosmopolitan pedagogies and pedagogies of
the unique.
Another
forum you might decide to use in sharing your stories is the Educational
Journal of Living Theories (EJOLTS). The chair of the editorial board, Moira
Laidlaw, a recipient of the 'Friend of |China' Award, has produced a living
educational theory account (Laidlaw, 2007) for the first issue of the Journal
and documented the development of China's Experimental Centre for Educational
Action Research in Foreign Languages Teaching at Ningxia Teachers University (
see http://people.bath.ac.uk/edsajw/moira.shtml ). The
co-creation of their narratives of their educational journey's (Laidlaw &
Fengjun, 2005) bring together values and understandings from a Hui (Muslim)
province of China and a predominantly white western culture in a most creative
partnership.
My final point is concerned with
producing something as human beings. In responding to Irene Watson's (2007)
keynote to the conference, I raised a question about the epistemological
significance of her presentation that evoked a focus on commodification. So, in
conclusion I want to share something from the earlier writings of Marx:
Suppose we had produced things as human beings: in his
production each of us would have twice affirmed himself and the other.
In my production I would have objectified my
individuality and its particularity, and in the course of the activity I would
have enjoyed an individual life, in viewing the object I would have experienced
the individual joy of knowing my personality as an objective, sensuously
perceptible, and indubitable power.
In your satisfaction and your use of my product I would
have had the direct and conscious satisfaction that my work satisfied a human
need, that it objectified human nature, and that it created an object
appropriate to the need of another human being.
I would have been the mediator between you and the
species and you would have experienced me as a redintegration of your own
nature and a necessary part of yourself; I would have been affirmed in your
thought as well as your love.
In my individual life I would have directly created your
life, in my individual activity I would have immediately confirmed and realized
my true human nature. (Bernstein, 1971, p.
48).
|What
I had in mind in my question to Irene Watson was the possibility that in the
sharing of each others' living educational theory we are expressing our unique
talents and offering our living theories as gifts, freely given, in the hope
that they may be of some use to others in living their productive lives.
References
Bernstein, B. (2000) Pedagogy,
Symbolic Control and Identity: Theory, Research, Critique.
Bernstein, R. (1971)
Praxis and Action. London; Duckworth.
Farren,
M. (2007) How am I Creating a
Pedagogy of the Unique through a Web of Betweenness with a New Epistemology for
Educational Knowledge? Action Research Expeditions, December 2007. Retrieved 11 December 2007
from http://www.arexpeditions.montana.edu/docs/articles.php
Gollan,
S. Stacey, K., Ralfs, C. & Hold, L. (2007) Working in Partnership. A panel
discussion at the Australian Critical Race and Whiteness Studies Association
Annual Conference, 10-12 December, Adelaide.
Kelada, O. (2007) Whiteness: A National Emergency. Presentation at the Australian Critical Race and Whiteness Studies Association Annual Conference, 10-12 December, Adelaide.
Ladson-Billings, G. (2006) 2006 Presidential Address. From the Achievement to the Education Debt: Understanding Achievement in U.S. Schools. Educational Researcher, Vol. 35, No. 7, pp. 3-12).
Laidlaw, M. & Fengjun, T. (2005) How can we enhance
educational and English-Language provision at our Action Research Centre and
beyond? Action Research Expeditions, June 2005.
Retrieved 11 December 2007 from http://www.arexpeditions.montana.edu/articleviewer.php?AID=87
Laidlaw, M. (2007) In Pursuit Of Counterpoint. Paper submitted for publication in the first issue of the Educational Journal of Living Theories. See http://ejolts.net/drupal/node/26
McNiff, J. (2007) My Story Is My Living Educational Theory. In Clandinin, J. (Ed.) (2007) Handbook of Narrative Enquiry: Mapping a Methodology, Thousand Island, Dehli, London; Sage.
Murray, Y. P. (2007) Transforming Our Bodies, Nations & Knowledges Through Action
Researching The Educational Influences Of Our Cosmopolitan Pedagogies. Draft
paper with Whitehead, J. (unpublished).
Murray, P. & Whitehead J. (2000) White and Black with
White Identities in self-studies of teacher-educator practices. Paper presented
at AERA 2000, New Orleans. Retrieved 9 October 2007 from http://people.bath.ac.uk/edsajw/A2/aerapj.htm
Said, E. W. (1994) Culture and Imperialism. London: Vintage.
Watson, I. (2007) Humanitarian Intervention, What Is Saved. Keynote to the 2007 Conference of the Australian Critical Race and Whiteness Studies Association, 10th September 2007.
Whitehead, J. & McNiff, J. (2006) Action Research Living Theory. London; Sage.