ÔHow can I improve my students'
motivation so they can improve their learning?Õ
A draft case study of AR into Integrated
Skills of English,
by Tao Rui
ChinaÕs Experimental Centre for
Educational Action Research in Foreign Languages Teaching,
Guyuan Teachers College, Ningxia, P.R.
China. January, 2004.
I: Introduction
Having been
exposed to the teacher-centered methods of my previous teachers for four years
in university as well as with the traditional concept:
Òa teacherÕs role is to deliver a moral,
pass on knowledge and skills, and help students solve puzzles,Ó (Confucius)
I followed suit
after graduation. In other words, my teaching methods in the classroom are
naturally traditional and adopt a teacher-centred academic style. This academic
teaching style is characterized by teaching techniques of grammatical
explanation and translation, and so is sometimes known as the 'grammar-translation
method.' (Cook P176.)
This is what I
have done in the past:
á
Lead my
students through the text of grammatical sentences step by step;
á
Provide some
background information concerning certain texts.
á
Paraphrase
some difficult words on grammatical points exist. I would like to paraphrase
them, or translate them into first language.
Through this
style, I believe I succeeded in delivering the necessary language knowledge as
well as giving cultural information to my students. Furthermore, as a teacher,
before the class, I prepared my lessons very carefully and thoroughly. In the
class, I did my best to pass on as much knowledge as possible to my students.
Once I fulfilled the syllabusÕs requirements, I was satisfied. Hence I believed
that I was a good and responsible teacher.
Such a situation
remained until Dr. Moira Laidlaw came to Guyuan TeacherÕs College together with
her Action Research theory and practice. AR, as a branch of western teaching
methodology, is also influenced by Socrates' dialectical method, characterised
by a logic of question and answer, and concentrating as well on students'
perspectives orientation and their learning much more than teachersÕ
methodology.
Here is a brief
introduction of Educational Action Research. Action Research is a term, which
refers to a practical way of looking at your own work to check that it is as
you would like it to be. É a form of self-reflection practice. (McNiff, 2002).
The basic steps of an AR process constitute an Action Plan:
á
we review our
current practice
á
identify an
aspect that we want to investigate
á
imagine a way
forward
á
try it out
and
á
take stock of
what happens
á
we modify we
are doing in the light of what we have found, and continue working
á
monitor what
we do
á
review and
evaluate the modified action (Whitehead, 1989)
All in all,
Educational AR is a self-reflective, problem-finding, problem-solving,
self-evaluative and self-improving process for teachers (McNiff, 2000, 2002).
With such a brief understanding of educational AR, in May 2002, I began my
journey as a teacher-researcher. My first step was to observe my classroom as
well as my studentsÕ learning. What I later found through observation is really
amazing.
First, during the
fifty-minute-long class, I kept talking just like a lecturer, explaining
difficult vocabulary, paraphrasing troublesome grammatical points, telling
students to do this or that. I was like a nanny doing everything for my
ÒbabiesÓ. Thus studentsÕ talking time was far less than teacherÕs talking time.
Secondly, since I was a ÒdictatorÓ, students became mere passive listeners. The
learning atmosphere was consequently inactive all the time: Thirdly, the
learning atmosphere itself was undynamic, controlled and intense, for students
never found enough freedom and space to speak, to communicate and to take part
in any activity. All these rendered students passive instead of active and
eager to learn. In other words, my academic teaching style restrained studentsÕ
motivation for learning. As soon as I identified such a problem, I developed it
into my first concern of Action Research, namely, How can I improve
studentsÕ motivation so they can improve their learning?
A brief
explanation of my concern
So, how could I
improve studentsÕ motivation so they could improve their learning. By students,
I mean the whole class, instead of individual students, for Òany class
teaching is a compromise to suit the greatest number of students" (Cook, 2000, p102). So I decided to
concentrate on how to improve the motivation of the majority of the whole class
instead of improving one or two studentsÕ motivation.
Next came
motivation:
"Motivation
in second-language learning has chiefly been used to refer to the long-term
fairly stable attitudes in the studentsÕ mind. Two types of motivation have been talked about :
integrative and instrumental motivationÓ. (Vivian, Cook, 2000, p97).
Since both of
these two motivations can benefit studentsÕ learning, I aimed to improve both
of integrative and instrumental motivations, which, I believe, contribute a lot
to studentsÕ success in second language learning.
Why am I
concerned about it?
Firstly, in terms
of the underlying values of some AR (Whitehead, 1989; McNiff, Lomax and
Whitehead, 2002), I learnt that what is most important for education in the
class should be studentsÕ learning not teacherÕs teaching (McNiff, 1993). No matter
how excellent a teacherÕs teaching method may be, it is nothing if it fails to
encourage and improve studentsÕ learning. The aim of education is to improve
studentsÕ learning. Secondly, when I distract my attention from my own teaching
to studentsÕ learning, studentsÕ silence, non-participation and passiveness
really frustrated me. It led me to
considering whether or not I was a responsible and good teacher after all. I
found the answer was Ònot reallyÓ, I was trapped in my own living contradiction
(Whitehead, 1989). This was constituted thus: to be a teacher, teaching
students well is most important, I hoped my students would achieve a lot from
me and in the future, what they have learned would consequently benefit their
students . However, what I observed only proved that I had failed to fulfill my
expectation and goes against my educational value of empowering students in
their learning.
Accordingly, two
problems at least arose out of my former teaching methods. One is my teaching
style was actually restraining studentsÕ motivation and degrading their
learning. The other was studentsÕ silence and non-cooperation, which in turn
influenced my arrangement and teaching in the class. I realized that things
would go round in a vicious circle, if no solution were provided for this
phenomenon. Thirdly, I now knew from my own experience that an active,
interesting learning atmosphere could improve studentsÕ motivation and thus
their learning.
I still remember
my own listening class as a college student. The teacher was so strict that
punishment and scolding words would swarm like wasps towards those of us who
made a mistake or failed to answer her questions. Her attitude seriously
affected our motivation. Most of my classmates kept silent and refused to be
active. The listening class was a nightmare. Even today, some scolding words
from my memory can make me shudder.
Such experiences
have led me to believe that the teacher has a great influence on her studentsÕ
motivation as well as their learning. It also makes me believe I, as an
educator, can do something to change my studentsÕ passivity and
non-participation.
Fourthly, the
questionnaire I devised at some point with my students in Class 2, Grade 2
showed that 99% students preferred to learn in an interesting, free, and
relaxed atmosphere. They donÕt want to learn in a passive and silent
atmosphere.
Fifthly, from my
own teaching experience, I think an 'academic' style benefits teacherÕs
teaching more than studentsÕ learning. In such a class, the teacher talks while
students listen. As a result, the teacher becomes a fluent lecturer, while
students poor remain speakers. Motivation consists of two chief factors, it
seems to me: the prevailing attitude to the learning situation, i.e. to the
teacher, and integrativeness (Cook, 2000, p168). I believe motivation should
also include studentsÕ attitude to the class, namely, the learning atmosphere.
Thus, my first step to alter such a situation is to change my learning
atmosphere.
How can I
improve studentsÕ motivation?
When realizing studentsÕ motivation was mainly restrained by my present academic style I decided to alter my teaching method, so as to maximize student-participation and minimize teacher-domination - to offer students much freedom to talk, to discuss and to communicate so as to change the passive, silent atmosphere into an active and interesting one.
First
hypothesis--pair/group work
My first
imagined solution was to apply group/pair work to my class. Instead of leading
students to the text sentence by sentence as before, I asked them to work in
pairs or groups, discussing with each other and then tell me their result. From
the very beginning, I found that my attempt was working. I walked around the
class and observed their behavior as they were doing their pair/group work. To
work in a group or pair seemed to come naturally, since they could face their
learning partners instead of the teacher. They usually held an animated talk,
and I could hear them arguing with each other, could see them smiling.
Most
importantly, they would like to stop me to ask questions such as, ÒMiss Tao,
what does this mean?" or ÒI canÕt understand thisÓ. This was really
impossible when I stood on the platform before, delivering knowledge to them.
SsÕ questioning in groups/pairs together with my own observations proved to me
that the present learning atmosphere had changed a lot and they were becoming
active in raising questions.
Another thing I
would like to add to suggest group/pair work does indeed change the learning
atmosphere, which in turn to some extent, improves studentsÕ motivation - is an
extract from my studentsÕ work. On one occasion the teaching aim was for
students to talk about their own future. Had I still followed my previous
teaching method, IÕd have asked students to keep silent and think about it for
several minutes, then ask some of them to describe their own future. However, I
didn't do it that way anymore. Ss were now required to talk about their future
in pairs or as part of their group work. Take Tian XingÕs group as an example.
Their group created a story of Ma DongyuanÕs future. Here are some extracts
from their story:
Ò Éafter two
years he will have a lovely daughter who is good at dancing and singing, By the
age of 35, he will divorce with his wife. Then he will have had disease and a
beautiful girl will fall in love with himÉÓ
This is a
complete and funny made-up story. I still remember when Tian Xing read it out,
other students laughed a lot. Such a story could not have resulted from my previous
teaching method, and I believe it proves to some extent that group/pair work
liberates students from the teacherÕs control and direction, offering them much
opportunity and freedom to speak in the way they want to. In addition, it also
fosters their creativity and imagination. Apart from this, I was also
enlightened by such an idea----why not try another method of ÒquestioningÓ
since students' actively questioning behavior seems naturally to arise out of
their pair/group work.
ii. Second
hypothesis---questioning
Based on
group/pair work, I decided to put a more questioning method into practice and
apply it mainly to the teaching of text. Students were divided into
groups/pairs, discussing the text with each other and solving problems by
themselves. Whenever some difficult problems were beyond their understanding,
they would present it to me through questioning and I would answer their
questions. Alternatively, I sometimes supervised their learning by questioning
them. Thus the questioning-method was put into effect in two ways: one was
through students raising questions and teachersÕ answering; another was
teachersÕ raising questions and studentsÕ answering them. Does this method
comply with my AR questions, in other words, does it improve studentsÕ motivation?
After a long time,
I collected studentsÕ feedback. According to that, most of them agreed that
questioning really improves their learning interest. When I collected studentsÕ
feedback, I told them to decide to sign or not to sign their names for I
believe it can guarantee the validity of my evidence. Thus if some students
wanted to say something against the teacher, they might feel more at ease if
they didn't have to sign their names. Here are some of their comments:
Zhang Lizheng
wrote: Your teaching way fits me, especially the questioning way. It not
only makes me more active, but also makes me learn it by myself. I found my
study was much more improved than before.
Another student
wrote: ÒI am very appreciative about your methods of teaching recently,
because you have a large change than before, we can ask you and you can answer
us. We can understand it well. It is better than before.Ó
Apart from this, I
myself also noticed that students were more active than before. All this
reassured me that questioning students on the basis of their group/pair work
actually helped improve their participation and motivation. However, things
always have two sides, just like a coin. LetÕs listen to several studentsÕ
voice who belong to the minority in the class.
An anonymous
student wrote: ÒI think it is good , but it doesnÕt make some students
understand the text completely or clearly because some good students can follow
this way, they can understand the text easily. But others donÕt pay much
attention to our lessonsÓ
Zhang Junlang
wrote: ÒWhen you teach with teacher-centered method, we felt very clear
about the structure, content and phrases of the articles. Thus it wonÕt take a
long time for us to finish our homework. With the questioning method though we
can understand the words, phrases very well, we failed to understand its
structure and content completely. Thus we couldnÕt finish our homework easily.
Of course, questioning really motivates us, activate the atmosphere, but I
notice that some students are busy with finding out questioning instead
understanding the article, whatÕs more, some studentsÕ questions are too far
beyond the article. Actually questions have nothing to do with what we will
learn. This is a waste of our time. So to me, I still prefer teach-centered
method than questioning method, for I can learn more by it .Ó
ZhangÕs critical
comments make me reflect a lot. It seems that there should be a balance between
questionnaire and academic style. A teacher shouldnÕt randomly force himself to
adopt one teaching method while utterly abandoning another or simply make a
judgement that this teaching method is better than that based on one
experience. The adoption of a certain kind of teaching method should be decided
by two factors: studentsÕ learning needs as well as the teaching materials
available. All in all, teaching methods should alter with students' learning
needs as well as the difficult degree of the teaching materials. As Cook
comments:
Òit is rare to
encounter a classroom that is a pure version of one or other of these reaching
styles as none of them fully satisfy all the needs of any real class of
students: nevertheless they provide convenient reference points for the
discussion o language teaching. (Cook, 2000, p.174)
Thus I believe
that teaching encourages a variety of methods. Take questioning as an example:
it seems to work well for me and the students if the teaching materials are
less difficult and individual student prefers them. Hence I tried to introduce
various teaching methods according to different teaching materials as well as
studentsÕ learning needs. The following is a list of what I have tried:
●
Micro-teaching
●
experiential
learning techniques
●
Encouragement
●
Teacher-centered
methods
●
Rearrangement
of the classroom
iii. The third hypothesisÑmicro-teaching
ÒThe Land Where There Were No Old MenÓ (a story from the textbook we were using[1]) is an article of low difficulty. It is full of simple conversations and few difficult grammatical points and the vocabulary is easy. This ascertains me that students are capable of learning and even teaching this text by themselves. Guided by this idea, I asked students to work in a group of 5 or 6, solving difficult problems and learning by themselves. In order to test my hypothesis, I required each group to choose a group leader who would be in charge of explaining certain paragraphs. To my surprise, they really did an excellent job. Most of them were good at controlling their language and making sense of it. An typical example is Tian XingÕs explanation of the following paragraph (appendix 2). I remember challenging her by questioning her explanation and she presented very satisfactory answers. Furthermore, studentsÕ feedbacks also proved that micro-teaching is really improving their learning.
Here are some words from studentsÕ group feedbacks (appendix3). Zhang Lizheng, Liu Xiaxia, Niu Huiyang, Zhao Weidong wrote:
ÒOur group thinks that this micro-learning is useful for our self-study and enables us to think of questions by ourselves. And it also improves our ability of teaching. In our group, we explain important and useful points one by one. We can improve our skills of explanation. And by this method, all of us must explain and teach the text, so the lazy people will be ÒpunishedÓ by explaining."
On the contrary, the words from Tian PingÕs group is really funny. They wrote:
ÒWe donÕt think it is an useful
way of learning a new article. There are many difficult vocabulary and phrases
even sentences. You should guide us to learn every point. This voice states
again that applying a variety of teaching methods according studentsÕ learning
needs and the teaching materials is extremely necessary and important."
iv. The fourth
hypothesisÑTPR of experiential learning
ÒWhere the Sun
Always RisesÓ is an article describing the scene of the sun rising in the
countryside. It is filled with exquisite language and vivid description. I
suppose that students can fully appreciate this article, especially the beauty
of nature if I adopt such skills of TPR of experiential learning. (TPR is a
language teaching method built around the coordination of speech and action. It
attempts to teach through physical activity. Jack C. Richards and Theodores
Rodgers, p. 87). From my point of view, it not only makes my class interesting
but also helps students understand this text very well. The following is some
extract from my reflective journals:
sentence 1: Òmy
eyes flash openÓ. To explain it, I required students to close their eyes and
not to open them until I counted from one to three. Through this they were able
to figure out that this sentence meant:
Ò open oneÕs eyes quickly and wideÓ;
sentence 2: ÒI
relax and curl deeper beneath the blanket's warmthÓ. When I asked students to
demonstrate it with their body language, Zhao Weidong even stretched his arms
and yawned.Ó
Sentence 3: ÒMy
mother whispers againÓ. To explain it, I stood on the platform with my hand on
my wrist, shouting Ôget upÕ to show the difference between Ò whisperÓ and
ÒshoutÓ. When students are asked to answer the question Òwhy whisper not shout
or screamÓ, Ma Dongyuan (usually a silent student) offered an excellent answer:
Òit showed motherÕs love for her childÓ.
Sentence 4: Òa
heron fans its wayÓ to understand the vivid description ÒfanÓ, students are
asked to stretch their arms to demonstrate a heronÕs flying and I observed most
of them were active in doing this. This also seemed to activate them.
As to me, all
these things can show students are motivated to learn, to participate. Another piece
of evidence I want to add is the following.
In the class I
drew a picture of the forest to show the meaning of the sentence Òa sliver of
brilliant red crests the top of the shadowed forestÓ. During the break, some
students added eyes and mouths to each tree of Òmy forestsÓ. To tell the truth,
I was moved at that time, for their joke seemed to show a friendly relationship
was being built between my students and myself. I donÕt believe the same
situation would have happened if I had still been using my previous more
academic style.
v. v. The fifth hypothesisÑencouragement, personal communication between teacher and students, rearrangement of the classroom
Now letÕs abandon such abstract theories as questioning method, TPR etc., because I found ways to encourage students that werenÕt routines or gambits. One of those findings was giving encouragement to some students. Ji Jianjun was usually a silent student. He seldom appeared active in my class. At first, I guessed it was due to his poor English. However an interview with him changed my mind. Here is a part of our talk concerning his study.
Tao Rui: in your opinion, what can I do to
improve your motivation?
Ji: last year, teacher Ma (Ma Jianfu is my
colleague) taught me the same course. He constantly asked me to answer his
questions. This made me feel that I was not ignored by the teacher.
Furthermore, whenever I raised a correct answer for a question, even a very
easy one, he would praise me a lot. His attitude to me really encourages me to
learn a lot and I began to recover my interest in English.
Tao Rui: How about your study now?
Ji: Well, much things have changed. Our
head teacher was changed and another student took my place of the monitor. You
began to teach us the integrated skills of English. I felt I lost my interest and confidence in English
again.
His words reminded
me of what I have done to him in my class. Whenever I asked him to answer my
questions, he did a bad job. His broken sentences and murmuring voice made me
feel tired. Furthermore, I was afraid I wouldn't fulfill the teaching schedule
and syllabus since I had to spend lots of time correcting his mistakes.
Therefore, I often avoided asking him questions and usually commented on his
answers with simple words such as ÒOK, well, sit down, pleaseÓ. As a result, my
conscious behavior possibly made him feel ignored by me and consequently he
seemed to lose his confidence and learning interest. This led me to believe
that teacherÕs encouragement to students and personal communication with them,
especially the slow ones, are extremely significant factors in their
development. It can improve to some extent some studentsÕ motivation.
Classroom
management is what I want to turn to next. On one occasion, I required students
to make a report on the topic of modernization. I was surprised that they were
more active in reading out their own reports than before. Their active
participation was only apparently due to a little change in classroom
management. Usually, they would give their reports standing on the platform,
which accordingly activated those seated in the front rows more than those
seated at the back. However, this time, thanks to a change of classroom
management (students were asked to turn back and show their reports in an open
area at the back of the class) they appeared more active in the face of such a
novelty, especially those sitting at the back. Students like Ma Dongyuan, Ma
Jianhui, Yanan, Wang Shuisheng, Zhang Junlan seemed eager to listen. They even
volunteered to read out their reports without my constant badgering, perhaps
because all at once they felt themselves to be a significant focus.
How will I know
that I have improved studentsÕ motivation?
Through the
above-mentioned formative evaluation, I may claim that my adoption of various
teaching methods has really motivated my students to improve their learning.
However, to further substantiate my claim, IÕd like to turn to some summative
evaluation (Interpretation on New Curriculum, P14)
i. My ways to collect evidence
Since AR inquires
a triangulation of evidence to validate a researcherÕs claim (Winter,
1989), I tried various ways to
collect data:
. questionnaires
. interview
. studentsÕ
feedback as soon as the class is over
. tape recording
. journals/notes
. observation
i.
ii. My
standards to evaluate my research
á
whether the
learning atmosphere is altered
á
examination
results
á
their
attitudes to my teaching
á
studentsÕ
improvement in their self-study ability
á
improvements
in creativity and confidence
After
one-and-a-half-year's research, I designed a questionnaire at the end of the
term on Class2, Grade 2. Here is an analysis of some of it[2]:
Question 4: Do you
like the learning atmosphere in my class?
Answer |
SsÕ choice |
% |
(a) interesting
v. relaxed |
14 |
67% |
(b) boring |
0 |
0 |
(c) just so so |
6 |
28% |
(d) terrible v.
pressured |
1 |
4% |
[notes: altogether 24ss took part in
this questionnaire, 2 were absent and 3 didnÕt answer this question. This
questionnaire was conducted anonymously, which, I believe to some extent,
increases its validity.]
Question 10: Do you think youÕre motivated
to learn in the class or in another word, you are happy and ready to learn
without much pressure?
Ss choice |
Numbers |
% |
Motivated |
17 |
76% |
Not motivated |
4 |
29% |
Question 8: How do
you feel about our previous teaching methods and present ones?
Tian Ping: the previous teaching method regard us
as a container, and the teacher tried to fill in it, while now the teacher and
students communicated with each other and interacted. It is better than before.
Niu Huiyan: Previously, the teacher kept talking
while students listening, but presently, the teaching method is
students-centered, encouraging students self-reflection, and communicating.
Question 11: Do you think my teaching method is
suitable for you? Why?
Zhao Weidong: Yes, because I can learn without
pressure.
An anonymous
student wrote: I felt no pressure for the learning atmosphere is active
which could make my feel interesting.
Here, a problem
arises, I believe. If I believe what students said in their questionnaires, I
might simply take it at face-value. How can I prove what they said really
happened, namely, were they really motivated to learn better than before? I
turned to their examination result. I believed if they were really motivated,
they would gain much improvement on their examination results. (Thanks to
Moira. It is she who leads me to think about this). I took a sample of their
final exams on two terms of the year, 2003, and made a comparison among the
classes of the same level. Here is a list:
Class |
Average scores |
Not failed% |
90~100 |
80~90 |
70~80 |
60~70 |
Up to 60 |
1 |
74.70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
74.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
61.78 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
70.92 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2nd |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
73 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
75.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
69 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
72 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
From these two
charts, we can see that the studentsÕ examination scores improved. On the one
hand, compared with these level classes, students in class 2's average scores
were in second place, which then moved to first place during the second term.
On the other hand, using an ipsative criterion, in other words, comparing the
studentsÕ former experiences with their present ones, we can see that they have
also improved. As to the studentsÕ self-study ability, I invited Tasha (my dear
foreign colleague) to interview six students of mine. (Tasha and I chose them
both according to their scores and degree of participation in class. Thus we
hoped they could represent the students of a high level, a middle level, and of
low attainment respectively. We also tape-recorded the interview in order to
increase validity. An analysis of their interview helped me draw the following
conclusions:
They mainly seemed
to prefer student-centered teaching methods, especially questioning which they
regarded as a good method to motivate them. Most importantly, they all agreed
that their self-study ability
improved during that year and were more motivated and interested in the
learning atmosphere. Tasha also told me that my students appeared more active
since I am engaged in Educational Action Research on them.
During these one
and a half years, I have experienced my own living contradictions. Thanks to
Moira LaidlawÕs instruction together with the enlightenment of AR as well as
other colleaguesÕ help - Li Peidong, Zhao Xiaohong, Tasha Bleistein, Ma Jianfu
- I have reflected on my own teaching and realized what I claimed and believed
were in reality going against what was actually happening and what I actually
wanted to happen. I believed that as long as a teacher played the role of
Òdelivering morals, passing on the knowledge and skills, and helping solve the
problemsÓ, s/he was no doubt a good teacher. I also believed that my previous
academic style helped to fulfill my dream of being a good teacher. Ironically,
what I later learned from students was that I actually denied my values in my
actions (Whitehead, 1989). By this austere teaching style I spoon-fed the
knowledge to my students, which, far from motivating them to learn, badly
constrained their creativity and freedom to communicate, as well as their insight
and rights as individuals. It is Moira and Action Research that have helped me
realize what was truly happening in my class. During my Action Research
enquiry, I have simultaneously developed my own living educational theory
(Whitehead, 1989, 1993) which, in mainly resulting from my own practice, is
bound to enlarge my horizons, strengthen my insight, and improve my knowledge
towards second language teaching as a professional teacher.
I have started to
regard education as a constantly developmental, sustainable process instead of
a static, passive 'thing'. Such practice and self-reflection, as well as
self-directing research have helped me enhance my own professional development.
I now feel capable of monitoring my teaching more flexibly, confidently and
wisely. Most importantly, I am able to concentrate my attention on my studentsÕ
learning not merely on my teaching. To sum up, what I have achieved will not
only improve my studentsÕ learning but also will empower my teaching and their
learning.
Now IÕd like to
share what living educational theory I have learned from my research in more
general terms. First comes motivation. Apart from studentsÕ aptitude,
motivation is an essential key to studentsÕ success in second-language
learning. To improve studentsÕ motivation is far from solving the whole
problem, however. Owing to different teaching materials as well as different
studentsÕ learning needs, a variety of teaching methods are required to enhance
motivation. Metaphorically, this can be linked to a spiderÕs web or
triangulation instead of a linear pathway. In other words, various teaching
methods and techniques work together to hold studentsÕ motivation, which, in my
view, a singular method can never achieve. For instance, a poor student may be
motivated by several encouraging words, whereas a good student may need more
challenging questions. Secondly, teachers are not always responsible for
studentsÕ motivation as that partly arises out of the students themselves.
I remember once
when other students appeared active in my class, several seemed tired and one
of them even yawned. To start with I thought I had failed to motivate them. But
why were other students so active? Through a small talk with them (Bai Liang,
Ji Jianjun, Ma Dongyuan) during the break, I learned they had gone to bed too
late the previous night!
Another typical
example is Tian Ping. She is usually inactive and silent in my class. Both
Moira and I supposed that she was not motivated. Moira once wrote: ÒHow can
you involve her in the learning? She is writing nothing in her book.Ó However, an interview with her later
proved that she preferred an Òinactive and silent learning styleÓ. Other
studentsÕ active participation even made her feel uncomfortable. She said her
silence didnÕt mean she was distracted from my teaching:
She also told
me that my teaching methods were very good because in this way it can cater to
different demands of different students. Thus she always kept quiet and
inactive in my class, but she insisted that she was listening carefully. For
her seldom taking notes, she said she tried to memorise what I said in my
lesson and her way did work. Thus her attitudes in my eyes were explained
properly. (Journal entry,
May)
I believe what she told me for she
usually gained a decent score in examinations. In the light of that, I am
reassured that students are also responsible for their own motivation and that
it reveals itself in different ways. Their tiredness and preference for
different learning styles may influence their motivation and learning.
Thirdly, I
advocate that, apart from the two types of motivations, namely, integrative and
instrumental, there is another typeÑemotional motivation. By it, I mean
teachersÕ encouragement and conscious attention to some students, particularly
the poor, may motivate them to learn. Put plainly, emotional motivation
encourages a building-up of a friendly relationship between teachers and
students through such ways as chat, individual communication, personal talk or
even conscious attention, encouragement etc. my previous experience with Ji
Jianjun and Tian Ping go some way to underlining that possible truth.
Another example
comes from Tian Xing. She is an active student. However I always used to ignore
her because of her very activeness because I believed more opportunities should
be offered to other inactive and poor students. What was beyond my expectation
was she was so sensitive that she felt my intentional avoidance of her. Without
sensing my true purpose, she once wrote to me: ÒI donÕt think I am motivated
by you and please give me a suitable explanation for why you always jump over
me, only me in the whole class?Ó Her inquiry really surprised me and assured me that emotional
motivation actually exists among students. No discrete teaching method would
solve this problem. What I realised was that I needed to have a talk with her,
informing her of my true intention.
Futhermore, my
research has strengthened my insight into Action Research. I hold the following
opinion: Action Research is a self-reflective, problem-spotting,
problem-solving, evaluative, and self-improving process. It starts with a value
(McNiff, 2002), then encourages educators to spot their own living
contradictions (Whitehead, 1989), and try to solve them so as to generate their
living educational theories through their practice and research. As a
consequence, they can enhance their professional development. As a researcher,
you have to undergo the process, which looks like a black box in some ways. AR
focuses on student-centered teaching and students' learning needs. And the
individualsÕ learning needs always come first. It seems a basic tenet of Action
Research (McNiff, 1993, 2000; Whitehead, 1989, 1993) that the whole class
consists of different individuals whose differences should be noted and
respected as human beings.
Here you may
notice another contradiction. What I have concerned myself about actually goes
against the above-mentioned value. What I have focused on and talked about are
mostly the group instead of individuals. Moira, after listening to my class
once wrote: ÒDo you know what individual students are doing in your
lesson?ÉNext time you could have given the poor students some individual
encouragement!Ó
To compensate for
that, I have decided that my next Action Research question should be:
ÒHow can I
understand individual studentsÕ learning needs so as to increase their
motivation in the learning of English?Ó
Cook, V. (2000),
ÒSecond Language Learning and Language TeachingÓ, Foreign Language Teaching and
Research Press, Beijing.
Richards, J. C.
and Theodores S. Rodgers, (1986), ÒApproaches and Methods in Language
TeachingÓ, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
McNiff, J (2002),
ÒAction Research for Professional Development", booklet at: http://www.jeanmcniff.com
Whitehead, J.,
(1985), ÒAn Analysis of an IndividualÕs Educational Development: The Basis for
Personally Oriented Action ResearchÓ, Shipman. M., Falmer Books, London.
Whitehead. J (1989),
ÒCreating a Living Educational theory from Questions of the kind, ÒHow do I
improve my practice?Ó Cambridge Journal of Education.
Winter, R.,
(1989), ÔLearning from ExperienceÕ, Falmer Press, England.
ÒThe New
Curriculum of English,Ó Beijing. The integrated Skills of English.
Edge, J, (2001)
Action Research: Case Studies in TESOL Practice Series, Jill Burton, Series
Editor.
McNiff, J.,
(2000), Teaching as Learning, Routledge, London.
McNiff, J. (2002)
with Whitehead, J., ÒAction Research: Principles and PracticeÓ, Routledge,
London and New York.
McNiff, J., Lomax,
P., Whitehead, J., (1996), You and Your Research Project, Hyde Publcation,
Dorset, U.K.
Laidlaw, M.,
(2002), ÒA Handbook of Communicative MethodologyÓ, first draft, China's Centre
for Educational Action Research in Foreign Languages Teaching, Guyuan Teachers
College, Ningxia, 756000.
Whitehead, J.,
1993, 'The Growth of Educational Knowledge', Hyde Publications, Dorset,
England.
Yule, G., (2000),
Ò The Study of LanguageÓ, Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press,
Beijing.
[2] The complete set of questionnaires conducted in this research are to be found in my data-archive.