ÔHow can I
Help the Students Improve their Speaking Ability in the Speaking and Listening
Part in the Class of Integrated Skills of English?Õ
By Wang
Shuqin, June 2004
ChinaÕs
Experimental Centre for Educational Action Research in Foreign Languages
Teaching, Guyuan Teachers College, Guyuan, 756000, Ningxia Province, P.R.
China.
Abstract: Teaching
speaking in the class of Integrated Skills put me in an awkward position. I
encountered my own "living contradiction" (Whitehead, 1989) which
consisted of wanting to build the students' professional ability but not
creating chances for them to speak.
My students changed
their learning from passivity to becoming active users of language. At the
beginning their learning consisted merely of reading and trying to remember the
sentences or even whole dialogues from the book. It occurred to me that they might not be able to use even
one sentence from it although they had been working on it for hours. I felt the
urge to do research about it and took appropriate actions. Not being restricted by the dialogue in
the textbook, I provided more topics and chances for them to work in pairs, in
groups, and to do individual or group presentation, to show likes or
complaints, to share joys or cares, to solve problems and take heart. The key
point was that they were consciously encouraged to learn the language by using
and participating in activities. They were desperately in need of improving
their speaking ability. And only the teachers' earnest desire to mend their
teaching can stem the heavy anxiety and worry from the students' minds. As a
result of more varied methods, the students' ability of speaking along with
their active engagement with vocabulary, interest, confidence, thinking
ability, etc, were all improved. In
doing action research I have varied my teaching-methods and improved the
situation.
My Educational Background
I am a teacher
in Guyuan Teachers' College, teaching the subject of Integrated Skills of
English in Ningxia Autonomous Region, the northwest of China. I graduated from a three-year college
in 1991for my first degree and then qualified in a second-Bachelors degree
after another 2 years' study in Ningxia University, in English language
education. I became a teacher in 1991,
teaching junior high from grade one to grade three during 1991Ñ1999 in a country
school. Then I moved here in 2001 and began to teach in Guyuan
Teachers' College. I have
taught English Grammar, Integrated Skills of English and the New Horizon
College English to the non-English majors. It was in this college that I encountered Dr. Moira Laidlaw
and learned about Action Research with some guidance from Professor Jean McNiff
and Dr. Jack Whitehead and as well as from Bath University, Department of
Education in England.
I didn't begin my
career of teaching with the larger intention of changing the world's education,
but what has remained in my memory was my preferences for some teachers who
were nice, caring and interesting, and my disgust for those who sought ways to
give students physical punishment, leaving marks both on body and heart, and
those who subjected students to words of humiliation. What has also remained in
my mind is the nightmare about some subjects aroused by some teachers' poor
teaching approaches. In my own
teaching experiences, the first few years were full of enthusiasm and novelty.
However, after using the same text book and teaching the same grade year after
year, my work became a routine and I had no idea whether I liked being a
teacher or not. Coming to Guyuan Teachers' College and having contact with
action research refreshed my mind about teaching.
My Understanding
of Action Research and the New Curriculum
"Teaching is guiding and facilitating learning, enabling the
learners to learn, setting the conditions for learning." (Principles of
Language Learning and Teaching, second edition by H. Douglas Brown). Although I felt happy after a good
class and sad after a bad one, I hardly considered seriously about how to
change a bad class to make it better. Therefore it was hard to say I was
involved in professional development as the years went by. Yet Action Research,
with its reflective teaching and student-centred preferences for teaching
introduced to us by Dr. Moira Laidlaw and in my readings of Jean McNiff (Action
Research: Principles and Practice), and her visit to us last November, as
well as guidance from Dr. Jack Whitehead in England, a new mode of classroom
teaching was established in my mind and I began to follow its guidance whenever
I went into the classroom. After each class or during a certain period in the
classroom, words like "Is it student-centred or teacher centred?"
"Did the students really learn something?" appeared in my mind and, I
believe, in the minds of most teachers in the Department of Foreign Languages
Teaching. Action Research has made
every teacher here into a researcher.
ÔWhat Action Research stands for is the realisation of human needs
towards autonomy, loving relationships and productive work; the urge towards
freedom, creativity and self-recreationÕ. (McNiff, 2002, Action
Research: Principles and Practice).
China is currently putting
out its "The New English Curriculum". The new rationale is as follows:
Foreign language learning, like other subjects, is part of the
overall development of all students.
Through learning a foreign language, the students can enrich their
experience of life, broaden their world vision, and enhance their thinking
skills. Language learning is most
effective when students' interest, motivation and attitudes are taken into
consideration. Evaluation should
be summative and formative and designed and administered to encourage the
learners rather to frustrate them.
It should be carried out in terms of what students can do rather than
what they cannot do.
In this new curriculum, new learning and teaching approaches are required. The new curriculum advocate process-oriented language learning and teaching approaches, such as experiential learning and cooperative learning: students are encouraged to experience the language, learn the language by self-discovery, participate in discussion and negotiation activities. It emphasises the role of positive affective states on the part of the students. It advocates the task-based approach to language learning and teaching: learning by doing and by using the language. It incorporates learning strategy development into the classroom instruction.
The new curriculum brings out a lot of changes accompanied with a new
vitality. At the same time, it
sets incomparable challenges for teachers. Action Research has prepared our
minds and trained our actions to get on the boat of the new curriculum ahead of
time. In doing action research in
my class, the students are improving their ability to use language. The
following is the process of the research I undertook. Throughout this paper, I
will point out how, in my research, the New Curriculum is already being
implemented in my classroom.
What do I
want to improve?
To start with, I will give some information about the text-book structure
of Integrated Skills of English. There are three
parts in each unit: Listening and Speaking, Comprehension, Extended
Activities. The first part is what
I have worked on. I started this
research from the beginning of the new term in the freshman class in October
2002 and finished it in a year.
My AR question is: How can I help the students to improve their
speaking ability in the speaking and listening part in the class of Integrated
Skills of English?
Why am I
concerned?
I love teaching and I want to be a good
teacher. In other words, I want to
help the students achieve the goal they hold in their lives; I want to perform
what is required of a teacher -controller,
assessor, organiser, prompter, participant and resource-provider (Harmer, 1983:201). In the students' three years of
studying here, their essential goal is to be able to say what they want to say
and the things required of them to be a teacher, so that their fear of the
future might be lessened. As a teacher, it is more than an obligation to help
them facilitate that ability and prepare them for their future. Yet a "living contradiction"
(You and Your Action Research, Whitehead, J. 2002) found its way into my class--- it
was hard to say the students were improving their speaking ability because they
were hardly speaking. All they did
was read or memorise. Would they be able to speak at all fluently or
communicate in real situations? Was their confidence for the future being
built? Were they learning or was
their time being wasted? All those questions are hard to answer if taken
seriously and systematically. The more I thought about it, the more frustration
and uneasiness I felt. Once, while
teaching my class (5), seeing they were so busy reading and trying to remember
the dialogue, I had only one sentence in my mind---They may not be able to put
one sentence into use later in their natural speech, even though they are
spending hours reading it.
Thinking of their present hard work, which might result in speech
paralysis, I was seized by pain in my heart and inspired with the determination
to change the situation (Nov, 11, 2002).
In the book Language Learning Strategies by Rebecca L.
Oxford, she writes:
"A
more practiced eye, a more receptive ear, a more fluent tongue, a more involved
heart, a more responsive mind" are the characteristics we want to
stimulate in students to enable them to become more proficient language
learners."
Yet my students were only reading and trying to
memorise, using their words only with vague applicability. Their minds, most of the time, just
seemed to be waiting to be fed. It
was hard to say that any other senses were involved, and certainly not that
they were learning with interest. They were neither using what they had grasped
nor using what they had currently learned from the given dialogue. In a word, they were not improving
their speaking ability. Yet
speaking ability is so crucial to language learners. It means failure not to
have it. There had to be some changes in my way of teaching. Then
my question asked itself: How can I
help the students improve their speaking ability in the speaking and listening
part in the class of Integrated Skills of English?
How did I perform my research?
1. Find the question
According to the
outline from Professor Jean McNiff and Dr. Jack Whitehead on making an action
plan in action research, (Action Research: Principles and Practice, second edition), I
produced my action plan.
l
We review our
current practice,
l
Identify an
aspect that we want to investigate,
l
Imagine a way
forward,
l
Try it out,
and
l
Take stock of
what happens.
l
We modify
what we are doing in the light of what we have found, and continue working in
this new way (try another option if the new way of working is not right )
l
Monitor what
we do
l
Review and
evaluate the modified actions.
What is the aspect where the "living
contradiction" became central in my practice (Jack Whitehead)? It was the aspect which meant I was not
really helping the students improve their speaking ability, which was in contradiction
to my value of being a good teacher. Although I found
co-existing questions, I just needed to focus on the one I was most concerned
about and start to work on it. After that insight, I realised I needed to take
time thinking about my problem and alter my approaches so that the students
would be stimulated, interested, motivated to speak and finally become masters
of speaking the language.
2. The search for solutions:
After I had pinned down my question: ÔHow can I help the students to
improve their speaking ability through the speaking and listening part in the
class?Õ I needed to find solutions. My colleagues and friends became my
helpers. Moira, as the supervisor
of our AR work, conducted meetings once a week to help us gain more knowledge
about action research and teaching.
At the meetings we discussed our problems, gave advice, helped and
criticized our ideas. During this time, my knowledge about teaching was
expanded and more methods were shared in the process of finding and solving
problems. Options like pair work,
group work, individual or group presentation, as well as general discussions
have become quite familiar and often-used ways. Terms like Ôteacher-centredÕ,
Ôstudent-centredÕ, students' participation, confidence, motivation, interest,
relaxed atmospheres, encouragement, creativity, etc, were often heard at the
discussion meetings. We learned that the focus of the research is ourselves, in
company with others (Jean McNiff, 2001, second edition).
Here professional development is enhanced through the individual taking
initiative and the community cooperating. The challenges from the new
curriculum imposed on the teachers are not to be feared but to be explored,
especially through the work of cooperation. The professional isolation in action research (Michael J.
Wallace, 1998) is ultimately a barrier to professional development. The way
that action research is conducted may be helpful for teachers in exploring the
new curriculum.
To solve the
problem, it became necessary to try out as many ways as possible. As to the new curriculum, I realised
that as a teacher, I was most likely to feel frustrated by the desire to find
the perfect answer that would settle the matter once and for all. But that's not the case. In terms of how to become a good
language teacher Wang Qiang (2000) has said:
"The most important and most difficult part of the making of a good language teacher is the development of professional competence, which is the state or quality of being adequately qualified for the profession, and armed with a specific range of skills, strategies, knowledge, and ability."
As it seems that
no one can be full qualified all at once through his/her professional life in
this rapidly developing world, development is required in every profession. For
a more specific question like mine, I needed to show the process of my
development, not just the results of it. In order to help me see the
improvements I intended to make, I devised a detailed analysis of my question.
To improve from the state of passively taking-in, I wanted my students to
become active producers of language. That is to say, to speak out their own
minds by using words or phrases they have already mastered. It's not just repeating the given text
or reciting the dialogue. They need to have more of a desire to talk, showing
more interest, to use more new words and expressions, to carry out more
extended conversations, to make fewer grammatical mistakes and to have more
confidence in speaking English. My
thoughts in these matters were confirmed and affirmed in their significance
after seeing the new curriculum. It states:
"Evaluation should be summative and formative and designed and administered to encourage the learners rather to frustrate them. It should be carried out in terms of what students can do rather than what they cannot do."
In my opinion,
all the activities teachers arrange in the classroom should also be to
encourage what students can do instead of frustrating them by what they canÕt
do!
3. What did I do?
With the above goal in
mind, I began to search for feasible ways from all directions to try to solve
the problem. I asked the
colleagues who teach the same subject about their ways, visited their classes
and even asked the students' opinion about it. The choices were put together as follows.
(1). Read the dialogue and pick out some, instead of all, phrases or
expressions to remember.
(2). Retell the dialogue and try to use as many new
words and phrases or structures as possible so in order to become familiar with
them.
(3). Ask each other what phrases, expressions or
sentences they have learned from the dialogue. Create a new situation to use them, even though it may be
very short.
(4). Pick any topic related to the given dialogue so
that the students feel interested in it, and will have words to say.
(5). Give their opinion about the content of the
dialogue, or give the story in the dialogue a different ending.
(6). Use pre-class speech (Duty-report), etc. During
one year (March, 2002---July, 2003) of implementing and observing, I have the
following outcome.
4.
The outcome
Class
(5), is what I chose to take notice and four students, Jack D, Bob, Zhang, and
Ma were in my main concern because of their poor level and meagre
participation. After putting the
different methods into practice, I saw the first change in the classroom
atmosphere. The students were all engaged in talking with each other
or in a group under different instructions according to the content of the
given dialogue. It gave me great
joy and relief to see them talking instead of reading or memorising. Sometimes
I heard laughter among them (December, 2002). It often happened that when the assigned time was over they
were still in the mood for talking.
I looked at them and thought, "teaching can be very relaxing and
enjoyable"(Dec 28, 2002).
Then in the next semester when we continued with Book Two, I watched for
more outcomes. In an afternoon
class on March 24th, 2003, we came to Unit 4 with the conversation about
"Childhood". After going
through the conversation, I asked them to use some of the phrases and sentences
from it to talk about their own childhood. Was it carefree and happy or was it a sad memory? As a result, every one of them was
involved in it, either listening or speaking. Ma, a student who used to be a listener only, was then
talking in a group with some girls.
Bai, a boy who seemed too shy to talk even to his deskmate due to his
quite poor English, was talking, although falteringly. I was pleased with their participation:
at least they were trying to use English actively.
In Unit 3 with
the function of expressing feelings of distress or annoyance, I told them it
was a good time to speak about they were unhappy about. After a few seconds,
one girl named Ryan stood up and said: "I'm really annoyed
by having to get up every morning at six thirty to do morning exercise".
Before the laughter ceased, another student followed, "I am tired of
looking up hundreds of new words every day". A little varied method has
aroused this novel effect. In it I saw more active participation, more interest
and more smiles on the learners' faces.
I was quite satisfied with what was going on in the classroom. I was sure that their vocabulary was
developmental now, while their minds started to search for more words to
use. I also found that their
ability would improve once they were given chances to speak, especially if the
topic was within their life experience. After that, pair work or group work
became a natural phenomenon in the classroom. Practice makes perfect was our
motto. The best way to speak good English is to speak. For teachers, it is
never good enough just to tell students the rules of speaking, or just keep
emphasizing how important speaking is, or just encourage them in dozens of
ways. I was learning that the most efficient and pratical way was to give them
as much time as possible in class to practise speaking itself.
Here I also
began to see how working together stimulates thinking and enhances efficiency
in studying. The new curriculum is encouraging the students to enrich their
experiences of life, broaden their world vision and enhance their thinking
skills through learning a foreign language. This is quite to my liking. To make
learning merely an object in the learning process may be the cause of the
negative results in English study.
"Language learning is most
effective when students' interest, motivation and attitudes are taken into
consideration." New Curriculum document, Beijing.
Motivation and
attitudes may not be obvious in a class.
But interest, coming mainly from how the teacher conducts the class,
focuses the students' attention or can mean that they put their heads on the
desk and become passive. The time for the students to speak in class is more
precious than any other time. Through speaking to their partner, they were able
to communicate feelings, problems, sharing methods, solving difficulties and
exploring life. My research about
speaking must emphasise studentsÕ interest, and take cooperation, confidence,
ability-building into consideration.
Bob in Class 5
seldom talked, whether in English or Chinese, in class or after class. But in the Unit talking about "My
Father", he spoke, coming up with something about his mother. I believe it was his courage and desire
to speak that had given rise to this change in him. In Unit 7, Book Two about
how pencil sharpeners were invented, he, as well as several others who
volunteered, expressed his idea about a person going out picking grass for medicine
but having his hand hurt by some kind of sharp-blade grass, which struck him
with the idea of inventing the pencil-sharpener. He was the one who volunteered
twice when asked to read. His participation in front of the whole class was
exciting and encouraging to some others.
Just from his voluntary speaking in class I can deduce he is gaining
confidence.
Topics related
to their own experiences made the class lively, which therefore served to
improveme their speaking ability. Sky, whose grammar basis was poor, missed
three weeks of class, and was therefore not confident enough to speak in
class. She said in a class meeting
on March 21 that she and her deskmate had determined to make dialogues without
reading from the exercise books. She didn't want to change partners although I
thought it would be better for them.
I did see that they were talking happily almost every time when assigned
to talk about something, despite her grammatical mistakes.
Jack D, a boy
whose two deskmates' English level is better than his, is sometimes left
reading his book alone, when the other person does not feel it necessary to
talk to him. I felt sorry for him
but encouraged him to take the initiative by asking questions first. In my notes from March 26, April 16,
20, he was seen sitting side ways, talking in gestures. In the duty-report time (time for free
speech), he came up and encouraged his classmates to use different ways to do
the duty report. He even gave a
little lesson of the different usage of words as an example (Nov 27,
2002). Then he let others ask him
whatever questions they wanted to ask (Dec 26, 2002).
Individual
evidence in a sense does not account for all the new features of my class. Those chosen students never knew they
were in a way special. They were
just a small part among the mass who was busy participating. After one teaching
demonstration with the other teachers' presence, the students in this less
active class presented their speech or anything they had prepared in English
one by one, as they often did.
What I said after each one was just "More?" The teachers were
obviously impressed by it as I heard later. Chances were equally given to all those who wanted to
try. And they also had to learn to
be responsible for their own study.
5. The ways I used to collect data
1. Teachers'
comments:
Tao Rui teaching
Integrated Skills of English and English Phonetics, said the following words
after visiting my class (May, 23, 2003):
" You have put the theory of student-centeredness into
practice. In your class, you give
the students almost all the time to speak. Your students were all involved in talking rigorously. They seemed to enjoy talking quite a
lot. I'm sure they'll make big
progress if they continue talking like that."
Tasha, the
foreign teacher here from 2001---2002 teaching Speaking, said: " Very
good! You gave them a lot of
chances to speak. You are a good
teacher" (Nov, 18, 2002)
Lena, teaching
the freshman Integrated Skills of English wrote:
"I was deeply impressed by your
teaching and benefited a lot from it. First, your pronunciation and intonation
provided a perfect model for the students to imitate. Second, your way of teaching varied all the time. Students did pair work or group work
more thoroughly and flexibly than any classes I've visited. You gave more
chances for them to practice. In
your class the students can also have fun in learning. It was somewhat like what we did in the
foreign teachers' class, quite helpful.
The thing that touched me most was your discipline for speaking. Just like what you said, ' Study is
your own thing.You won't have any changes unless you want to change it
yourself. Instead of calling names, your students felt urgent to take the
chance to show themselves and learn.
Though it was hard at the beginning because of their former learning
experience, it was critically important and beneficial to help them form such a
habit, and, therefore, they could become independent learners later. I think I
should apply these good ideas into my later teaching and try to learn more from
you. I really appreciate your responsibility of teaching and I'm sure your
students will be grateful to you."
Jana Thompson, a
foreign teacher who taught Speaking, Culture and Literature, said after
visiting my class (April 7, 2003):
"You provided a relaxing environment so the students could be self-motivated to come up and speak before the whole class openly from their hearts. So there was real communication between teacher-students, students-students. They had individual and personal interests. Motivated by that, they used vocabulary from the previous lessons, in which they confessed wrongs, shared dreams, hopes and then received encouragement in return. In this environment, I saw the students communicate as openly from their hearts as any class I've ever seen"
Ms. Zhao,
vice-professor in our department who has taught Integrated Skills of English
for years, said in one conclusive sentence to another teacher after my teaching
demonstration (May 21, 2003), "Very successful!"
Theresa Ma, said
after visiting my class on October 3, 2003 that the atmosphere in the classroom
was very lively. The students were active. It was surprising for her see all the students were involved
in the activity. Later she told me
she used my method in her class.
2. Students 's
spontaneously-offered comments:
Z JW: Miss Wang's
class provides us with many opportunities to speak, more than other teachers I
heard of. It is very good to
practice our oral English.
G YY: My classmates like what I prepared each time, but I don't have
many chances to present because the teacher doesn't call my name. (I assume that the students do have a
desire to show their creativity and talent.)
3. Questionnaire
The questions I
asked were as the following:
1. Is
Miss Wang's teaching of speaking different from other teachers who teach the
same part, in what way? (This questionnaire was conducted among my students who
were re-divided into different classes.)
2.
How did/does
she organise the students to talk?
Are they helpful? Why?
3.
Which one of
the following choices is true to you?
Put "Y" for yes and "N" for no in the bracket before
the sentences.
( )
1). I was/am given equal
chances to speak like everybody else.
( )
2.) The atmosphere in the
classroom was/is relaxing and I didn't/don't feel nervous.
( ) 3. )The
topics she chose were mostly interesting and close to my life so I know what to
talk about.
( ) 4.
)With the many chances provided to speak, I can use some of the new words or
phrases I have learned recently.
( ) 5.) I
can speak longer sentences and I can talk for a longer time than before.
( )
6.) I am making fewer
mistakes in both pronunciation and grammar than before.
( )
7.) I have more confidence
to speak English than before.
( ) 8
) Choose from the ( ) and fill in the blank: I have made _______progress in
speaking. (a little, some,
much)
4.
What are some other ways she used that are helpful in improving your speaking
ability?
5. In what way do you think she can improve her teaching in speaking?
DXJ: (one of the chosen four) put "Yes" in all the brackets
under the 3rd question. He put
"much" in the last bracket to say he has made much progress in
speaking.
ZXH: (another chosen one) put five "yes" to the brackets and
"some" to the last bracket which asks how much progress she has made
in speaking. The two
"No"s she put was under the statements----The atmosphere in the
classroom was relaxing and I didn't feel nervous. ----The topics were mostly
interesting so I have words to say. (Under this statement, she put
"No" in the bracket but put "sometimes" after the
sentence). To a student whose grammar was terribly poor, it was quite honest
for her to put two "NoÕs there, because she has not yet reached the level
she desired. I understand that she
still felt nervous when I asked the students to volunteer, or to present their
dialogue. But at other times she
was not, because she and her partner formed the most co-operative group in the
whole class.
BPJ: Put "yes" to
all the yes-no questions. He
underlined the words "atmosphere", "relaxing", and
"nervous" in the 2nd statement, and "confidence" in the 7th
statement. In the 8th, he chose
"much" to fill up the blank, to mean he has made much progress in
speaking (although his speaking may still be quite dissatisfactory).
Among the 46
handed-in papers, my way to evaluate it was to find out how frequently certain
key words appeared as well as the answers to the yes-no questions. Here are the results.
Questionnaire Results
1. Key words
appeared in answering the written questions:
Words
Times
interested/interesting 13
relaxed/free 11
confidence/brave 11
share opinions 9
improve/make progress 9
vocabulary/new words 4
talk about recent life 4
actively 4
equal chances to challenge ourselves 4
more chances 4
things we want to talk about 3
have more to say 2
motivate/encourage 1
opportunity to present 1
express opinion without prepar. too much 1
train ourselves 1
The next is the answers to the yes-no questions: (the 1st number is the
number of people who chose "yes" for the answer. The 2nd is the ratio.)
1).
I was/am given equal chances to speak like anyone else. (40, 100%)
2.)
The
atmosphere in the classroom was/is relaxing and I didn't/don't feel
nervous. (34, 74%)
3.)
The topics
were mostly interesting so I have words to say. (33, 72%)
4.)
With the many
chances provided to speak, I can use some of the new words or phrases I have
learned recently. (41, 89%)
5.)
I can speak
longer sentences and talk for a longer time than before.
(41, 89%)
6.) I am making fewer
mistakes in both pronunciation and grammar than before. (39, 85%)
7.) I have more
confidence to speak English than before.
(40, 87%)
8 ) Choose from
the ( ) and fill in the
blank: I have made _______progress
in speaking. (a little, some,
much)
a little (8, 17%), some (25, 54%), much(13, 28%)
Analysis of the answers:
The answer for the 2nd question (relaxing atmosphere and not nervous)and
3rd statement (I have words to say) is not as ideal as I had hoped. However, I don't regard it as a failure
in my research because I believe I actually put too much content in one
statement. In the 2nd, I should have just put "The atmosphere in the
classroom was/is relaxing", and "I don't feel nervous" as
another question. And the 3rd one should be "The topics were/are mostly
interesting", and "I have words to say" in a different one.
So, I believe the answers to those two questions were mainly affected by
the latter part because they don't feel completely free from being nervous
because of their not- ideal- yet level. There's no doubt in my mind that they
don't feel as nervous when talking to their own partner or in their own
groups. In addition, being limited
by their interest or knowledge, they don't have much to say every time. Another
reason for the low ratio is that this questionnaire was done among all the
students I have taught or I'm now teaching. Eighteen of them have only become
familiar with my method over two months. So their answers may not be the result
of my methods.
6. My Claim
I didn't use interview as my data because I don't think their answers in
front of the teacher hold much water. Maybe my data or evidence is not
sufficient enough to make a claim but the above is all I have done. According
to the evidence given above, I believe can claim that my situation has
changed---the students have improved their speaking ability with my teaching
and others' help.
Teaching is learning (Jean, McNiff, 1993). I have learned that I can actually make some changes for the
benefit of others.
7. My review over what I have done in action research
Doing action research requires a consistent collection of data, as well
as watching for every change in the learners. But during my research, I often
forgot to take down notes when I should have. My evidence needs to be
strengthened for this paper but the results here are all I can be certain
about.
8. Acknowledgements
My great thanks to Dr. Moira Laidlaw who has spent her three years here
leading us by hand with her pieces after pieces of paper, onto the road of
action research for the development of education in China.
9.My new research question
ÔHow can I encourage
the students' creativity in my teaching?Õ
Bibliography
Oxford, R., (1990), "Language Learning Strategies", Boston,
Massachusetts.
McNiff, J., (1993), "Teaching as Learning", Routledge, London.
McNiff, J., (2002), "Action Research for Professional
Development", London
McNiff, J., with Whitehead, J., (2002), "Action Research:
Principles and Practice", Routledge, London and New York.
Wallace, J., (1998), "Action Research for Language Teacher",
Cambridge, England.
McNiff, J., Lomax, P., Whitehead, J., (1996), "You and Your Action
Research Project", Hyde Publications, Dorset, U.K..
Wang Qiang, (2000), "A Course in English Language Teaching",
Beijing.
Laidlaw, M., (2002), "A Handbook of Communicative
Methodology", Guyuan Teachers College.
Whitehead, J., (1989), "How can I improve my practice?"
Zou Weicheng, (1999), "Integrated Skills of English", Beijing.