Paulus MurrayÕs
response (5 February 2004) to Tao RuiÕs action research account on, How can I improve my
students' motivation so they can improve their learning? Paulus has sent this
response to his own students at the Royal Agricultural College in Cirencester,
near Bath. You can access PaulusÕ homepage at:
http://www.royagcol.ac.uk/%7Epaul_murray/Sub_Pages/FurtherInformation.htm
Here is PaulusÕ
response
If you click on
this link you will be able to read Tao Rui's paper - http://www.actionresearch.net//moira/taoruiardr.htm
Following my two
sessions with, I'm sharing this paper with you as an illustration of good
quality (educational) action research.
I'd like to thank
those of you who attended yesterday.
While Tao
Rui's paper very clearly demonstrates how personal theory (Jean
McNiff) and living theory (Jack Whitehead) can start with the role of
the self and one's practice in Action Research, Tao Rui also shows how her own
"practitioner research" (Marion Dadds & Susan Hart, 2000, Doing
Practitioner Research Differently, Routledge) influences
a momentum of 'culture' change and organizational transformation
in respect of 'Quality' in her organization (in Tao Rui's context
the "quality" of educative practice as it supports the end-user,
i.e. the learner, and enhances and enriches the conscious awareness of the
educator/practitioner is the 'quality' I have in mind).
This excites me
to be sure.
I'm sending this
because I was engaged and excited by the questions from Helen, Lucas,
Karen, Colette and Dan in particular concerning academic rigour in Action
research, questions of validity, and presenting Action Research to positivistic
audiences (like yourselves, for the most part)
As you read
Tao Rui's paper do try to get a feel for the very strong
"practitioner researcher" base of this piece.
Action Research
is particularly fruitful for those who seek to use the MBA as an
opportunity to explore and inquire into the base of their practice -
Who am I as a manager? Consultant? Farmer? Equine practitioner?
Action inquiry of
this kind is given the name 'practitioner research'.
How often do
managers & farmers reflect on their practice in this way, I wonder?
In the privacy of
internal dialogue much of the time I guess!
How often do
managers pause from the busy-ness of 'doing', and reflect on their
responsibilities as 'practitioners' with complex ethical responsibilities
to self, to colleagues, and to their organizations for
improving their practice while also being prepared to hold themselves
publicly accountable for their improvement in the way that tao Rui is doing in
her action inquiry paper?
This is
one exciting application of Action Research to organizations.
Do notice how Tao
Rui integrates the ideas of others into her own analysis.
This is a skill
you will need to demonstrate in your dissertation.
Bear in mind that
the dissertation isn't merely a 'management report' or a long paper -
if this is your expectation then I suggest you talk with your
course managers.
Rita and I were
talking about this together yesterday evening.
We'd both be
delighted to chat with you together about the dissertation over
coffee in the Postgraduate common room if you'd like that.
Observe how Tao
Rui produces a competent review of a selection of the Action Research
literature (admittedly narrow, though this is a paper, and not a
Masters dissertation, so my implied criticism is muted).
By sending this
paper I'm hoping to influence your education in respect of how you might
think about the ways that you can demonstrate the skills below in your
dissertation:
¥ a competent review of
the literature for coursework and for your dissertation
¥ integration of the
ideas on others into your own analysis and your emergent personal theory and
self-knowledge.
I'd enjoy us
sharing what we each think & feel about Tao Rui's paper. I
also very much enjoyed yesterday morningÕs session and thank you.
Peace &
Respect, Paulus